ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
In-hospital and long-term outcomes in spontaneous coronary artery dissection with concurrent cardiac arrest: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Our understanding of factors predisposing patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) to worse outcomes, such as concurrent sudden cardiac arrest (CA) and secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death in those patients, is limited. Objective: We conducted the largest systematic review of studies assessing clinical outcomes in SCAD with concurrent CA. Methods: This study was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus were searched using relevant search terms including "Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection," "Ventricular Tachycardia," "Ventricular Fibrillation," "Sudden Cardiac Death," and "Cardiac Arrest." The search was conducted from database inception to January 2025. Results: Out of 269 studies that underwent screening, 10 were included (n = 3978). In-hospital mortality, postdischarge mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and recurrent SCAD occurred in 20%, 3%, 12%, and 9% of patients with SCAD and CA, respectively. When compared with patients with SCAD without CA, patients with SCAD and CA were at significantly higher risk of in-hospital mortality (risk ratio [RR] 6.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-10.1, Conclusion: SCAD with concurrent CA is associated with worse in-hospital and long-term outcomes, although long-term rate of administered defibrillator therapies was low, supporting a conservative approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.