ArticleHeart rhythm O22025
Association between quality of life and redo procedures after pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation patients: Data from the Netherlands Heart Registration.
Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly impacts quality of life (QoL), necessitating effective therapeutic interventions such as pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Although PVI's success is often measured by freedom from arrhythmia, clinical practice emphasizes symptom freedom and patient comfort, as captured by QoL tools such as the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire. Objective: This study investigates the association between baseline QoL, changes in QoL, and redo PVI, aiming to align patient-centered outcomes with clinical decision-making. Methods: Data from 3336 AF patients undergoing first-time PVI between 2018 and 2021 in Dutch heart centers were analyzed. Patients with baseline and 1-year follow-up QoL scores were categorized into quartiles based on pre-PVI AFEQT scores, and redo PVI rates were assessed within 1 year. Results: Redo PVI was performed in 16.0% of patients within 1 year. Significant differences in left atrial volume index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and AF type were observed between redo and no-redo groups. Median AFEQT scores improved significantly: from 53.9 to 71.3 in redo patients and from 57.4 to 88.0 in others ( Conclusion: Lower baseline QoL is associated with a higher likelihood of redo PVI, emphasizing the role of patient-reported outcomes in AF management. Integrating QoL assessments into routine practice may support individualized care, create risk stratification, and contribute to standardizing clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.