ReviewBiologics : targets & therapy2025
Update on Biologic Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Five-year Narrative Review.
Review in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Early intensification versus step-up biologic strategies in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of remission and safety outcomes.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2026Pooled it
- PAFLAR guidelines for oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Guideline
- Digital home monitoring in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis to increase intervals of hospital visits.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "biologic era" in the management of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) has begun in the year 2000, with the publication of the randomized controlled trial on etanercept. In the subsequent years, there has been continued progress, marked by the availability of new therapeutic agents and the shift towards early aggressive interventions. In addition, a more rational therapeutic approach has been fostered by the promulgation of therapeutic recommendations and guidelines. In parallel with the growing use of the novel biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in the real world of clinical practice, additional information has been gained about their effectiveness and safety. Furthermore, the role of the various bDMARDs in the management of the different JIA categories and of the main disease complications and comorbidities has been scrutinized. Innovative management strategies, such as the step-down and the treat-to-target, have been proposed to maximize the therapeutic benefits through the optimal combination of the newer and conventional medications. However, despite this progress several unmet needs remain, including the lack of well-established criteria for medication discontinuation after the attainment of sustained disease remission and of effective alternatives for patients who respond inadequately to the contemporary therapeutic modalities. The research agenda also calls for the search for reliable early predictors of therapeutic response that foster personalization of treatment and increase its precision. The aim of this Review is to summarize the evidence obtained in the past 5 years in the field of biologic therapy for JIA and to discuss the remaining gaps and the future perspectives of the use of these medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.