ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease reports
Relationship between extracranial carotid artery calcification and amyloid-β deposition in the brain among the very old: A retrospective study.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Extracranial carotid artery calcification (ECAC) is a known risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and has been associated with an increased risk of dementia and Alzheimer's disease. However, the relationship between ECAC and amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in older adults has not been fully understood. Objective: This study aims to determine the relationship between ECAC and Aβ deposition in very old adults. Methods: 90 participants (87.2 ± 2.7 years old, 96% whites, 63% males) without dementia from an observational study were included in the cross-sectional analysis. Aβ deposition in the brain was assessed using the Results: Among the participants, 82 (91%) had carotid plaques, and 46 (51%) were globally Aβ positive by PiB-PET. ECAC was less frequently observed in the Aβ positive group compared to the Aβ negative group (90% versus 81%, p = 0.3). The odds of Aβ positivity in those with ECAC were 62% lower than in those without ECAC. However, the association was not statistically significant (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: [0.08, 1.76 ], p = 0.2). Conclusions: In the population whose average age is older than 85 without dementia, there is no statistically significant association between ECAC and Aβ deposition after adjusting for confounding factors. The relationship between ECAC and dementia in older adults warrants further analysis in a larger and more racially and ethnically diverse population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.