ReviewRSC sustainability2025
Towards polycotton waste valorisation: depolymerisation of cotton to glucose with polyester preservation.
Review in RSC sustainability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrated Deep Eutectic Solvents for the Sustainable Valorization of Textile Waste.ChemSusChem · 2026Article
- 5‑(Chloromethyl)furfural from Polycotton Waste Textile in a Biphasic System: Different Process Designs.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Solid-state platform (SSP) to produce terpenes from enzymatically treated textile waste withRSC advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Every second, the equivalent of a garbage truck filled with textile waste is discarded. Due to the complex composition of clothing materials, more than 80 wt% of this waste is either incinerated or sent to landfills. Currently, only 15 wt% of textiles are recycled, and of that fraction, approximately 93 wt% undergoes downcycling, resulting in lower-value products. Generally, about 50 wt% of textile waste is composed of polycotton-a blend of cotton, a glucose-based polysaccharide, and polyester, primarily poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). Although this combination leverages the advantageous properties of both fibres, full valorisation of these materials is complex due to their blended structure. Simultaneously, there is an urgent need to transition away from fossil-based feedstocks. Cotton-rich textiles present a promising alternative as a non-food-based glucose source for the chemical industry, owing to their high cellulose content and widespread availability. Therefore, this review explores the current state-of-the-art methods for hydrolysing cotton into glucose through acid and/or enzymatic hydrolysis, while preserving the polyester component. These techniques enable the effective separation and subsequent valorisation of both cotton and PET fractions, facilitating their reuse in the production of new materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.