Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717786›Full record

ArticleChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2025

Overhauser Dynamic Nuclear Polarization of Lithiated Graphite Anodes: Probing Bulk and Surface Structures.

Teresa Insinna, Anne-Laure Barra, Clare P Grey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Teresa InsinnaYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6484-4323
Anne-Laure BarraLNCMI-CNRS, EMFL, Univ. Grenoble-Alpes, 25 Rue des Martyrs, B.P. 166, 38042 Cedex 9 Grenoble, France.
Clare P GreyYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5572-192X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graphite is used, almost ubiquitously, as an anode material in today's high energy density Li-ion batteries. Both artificial and natural graphites are widely used, and there are large differences in the production methods, cost, particle morphologies, sizes, and percentage of defects in their structures, all these parameters affecting use and performance. The success of graphite as an anode depends on the formation of a Li-ion-conducting passivation layer (the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI)) on the first cycle, with the nature of this layer still being under investigation with a range of approaches. During lithiation (charge in a full cell), graphite is lithiated in stages and becomes electronically conductive. The conduction electrons of lithiated graphite anodes are exploited in this work to enhance the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) signal of bulk and surface nuclei via Overhauser dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP). The parameters directly affecting the enhancement factor (leakage factor, saturation factor, and coupling factor) are examined in detail for an artificial graphite at different lithiation stages. Four additional (natural and artificial) graphites are then studied to explore the effects of particle size and morphology, electron relaxation times, and conductivity on the observed DNP enhancements. Finally, the polarization transfer between bulk and surface (SEI) species is explored through

Identifiers

PMID40717786
PMCPMC12287998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.