ArticleEthiopian journal of health sciences2025
Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment and Prophylaxis Administration among Admitted Patients in Lagos, Nigeria: A Quality Improvement Project.
Article in Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment and Prophylaxis Administration among Admitted Patients in Lagos, Nigeria: A Quality Improvement Project.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially life-threatening and costly complication of hospitalization. In many developing countries, VTE risk assessment at admission is not routinely conducted. This quality improvement project aimed to audit and improve the VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis administration among patients admitted to the Meridian Cardiac Centre in Lagos, Nigeria, over two cycles. Methods: This was a quality improvement project. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline NG89 served as the standard. In the second cycle, the Caprini Risk Assessment Model (RAM) was introduced for assessing VTE risk at admission. The RAM was also retrospectively applied to assess patients' VTE risk categories in both cycles. Results: No patients were assessed for their VTE risk during the first cycle. By the second cycle, following an educational meeting and the introduction of the Caprini RAM, 56% of patients were assessed for their VTE risk. Conclusions: VTE risk assessment practices were poor in this facility. Continuous education for medical practitioners and proper documentation of clinical notes will improve the categorization of medical inpatients based on their VTE risk and improve the outcomes of future audits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.