Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717710›Full record

ArticleBioscience2025

Conceptual and ethical considerations in invasion science.

Phillip J Haubrock, Ben Parker, Dagmara Błońska, Elizabeta Briski, Teun Everts, Romina D Fernandez, Antonín Kouba, Melina Kourantidou, Irmak Kurtul, Stefano Mammola and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The impacts of biological invasions.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Phillip J HaubrockDepartment of River Ecology and Conservation, Senckenberg Research Institute and the Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-4341
Ben ParkerDepartment of Biosciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, United Kingdom.
Dagmara BłońskaDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Dorset, England, United Kingdom.
Elizabeta BriskiGEOMAR Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Teun EvertsResearch Institute for Nature and Forest, Genetic Diversity, Geraardsbergen, Belgium, Department of Biology, Plant Conservation, Population Biology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Romina D FernandezInstituto de Ecología Regional, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán-CONICET, Tucumán, Argentina.
Antonín KoubaFaculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Melina KourantidouUniversity of Brest, French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea (Ifremer), National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Institute of Research for Development (IRD), Joint Research Unit 6308 (UMR 6308), Center for the Study of Marine Resource Management and Coastal Planning (AMURE), European Institute for Marine Studies (IUEM), F-29280 Plouzané, France.
Irmak KurtulMarine and Inland Waters Sciences and Technology Department, Faculty of Fisheries, Ege University, İzmir, Türkiye.
Stefano MammolaWater Research Institute, National Research Council, Pallanza, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4471-9055
Dmitrii L MusolinEuropean and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3913-3674
Martin A NuñezDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, United States.
Julian D OldenSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2143-1187
Jes J RasmussenDepartment of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
David RenaultNational Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), ECOBIO (Ecosystèmes, biodiversité, évolution), Université Rennes, Rennes, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3644-1759
James C RussellSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ronaldo SousaCentre for Molecular and Environmental Biology, Aquatic Research Network, Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability, Department of Biology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5961-5515
Ali Serhan TarkanDepartment of Ecology and Vertebrate Zoology, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
J Robert BrittonDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bournemouth University, Dorset, England, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasion science addresses interconnected ecological, economic, and social challenges posed by the introduction of nonnative species. Therefore, invasion scientists have to consider and reconcile interdisciplinary needs while addressing the potential implications of their findings. Navigating diverse disciplines, including environmental sciences, ecology, economics, and the humanities, invasion scientists seek to arrive at informed decisions on invasion risk, impact, and management. Individual biases, uncertainties, and systemic pressures influence the ability to maintain objectivity and resist pressures that might otherwise distort their findings or applications. In the present commentary, we examine conceptual and ethical dilemmas within the field of invasion science, particularly reputational and the risks of the discipline perpetuating its own relevance by framing invasions as insurmountable challenges. In the discussion, we highlight how incentive structures, biased assessments and framing, and conflicts of interest may compromise the discipline's integrity. We also explore questions surrounding human responsibility to animal welfare and highlight ethical conundrums in the management of invasive species.

Indexed as

environmental ethicsethical dilemmashuman responsibilityphilosophical challengessustainability science

Identifiers

PMID40717710
PMCPMC12290455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.