ArticleImmunoTargets and therapy2025
Hepatic Metabolic Signature and Its Association with the Response to Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Article in ImmunoTargets and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Increased metabolic activity is frequently observed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the impact of this increased metabolic activity on the efficacy of current treatments, such as the combination immunotherapy using atezolizumab and bevacizumab for HCC, remains unknown. Methods: Gene expression data from mouse livers representing hepatic metabolic activity and HCC patient tumor tissues were used to identify a transcriptomic signature for high metabolic activity in HCC tumors. The hepatic metabolic signature (HMS) was used to categorize HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or sorafenib from the IMbrave150 clinical trial into high-or low-metabolic groups, using multiple statistical approaches to evaluate the clinical relevance of the signature. Results: The study uncovered a robust association between high HMS and poor overall survival in HCC patients across multiple independent cohorts. Notably, high HMS patients in IMbrave150 did not show significant benefit of the atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment in terms of overall survival or progression-free survival compared to sorafenib monotherapy. Conversely, low HMS patients demonstrated superior overall and progression-free survival outcomes with the combination regimen relative to sorafenib alone. Furthermore, an association between high HMS and features of hepatic stem cells and increased genomic instability was identified. Conclusion: This study provides compelling evidence that the HMS could be a predictive biomarker to identify potential HCC patients with therapeutic benefits from combination immunotherapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. Leveraging such predictive metabolic biomarkers may pave the way for tailored, precision medicine strategies that maximize therapeutic responses and improve outcomes for HCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.