Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717676›Full record

GuidelineAmerican journal of hematology2025

Practical Guidance on Clinical Management of Belantamab Mafodotin-Associated Ocular Events.

Evangelos Terpos, Suzanne Trudel, María-Victoria Mateos, Nicolás Alejandre, Kathryn Colby, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Simona Degli Esposti, Asim V Farooq, Maria Gavriatopoulou, Francesca Gay and 10 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Evangelos TerposDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-5133-1422
Suzanne TrudelPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
María-Victoria MateosInstitute of Cancer Molecular and Cellular Biology, University Hospital of Salamanca/Institute of Biomedical Research of Salamanca, Salamanca University, Salamanca, Spain.
Nicolás AlejandreDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
Kathryn ColbyDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Meletios A DimopoulosDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-3254
Simona Degli EspostiMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Asim V FarooqDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Maria GavriatopoulouDepartment of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6244-1229
Francesca GayDivision of Hematology, University of Turin, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Vania HungriaClínica São Germano, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4327-1957
K Martin KortümDepartment of Internal Medicine 2, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Xavier LeleuService D'hématologie et Thérapie Cellulaire, Hôpital La Milétrie, and Centre D'investigation Clinique INSERM 1402, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.
Sagar LonialDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Hang QuachSt. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Lugui QiuNational Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (PUMC), Tianjin, China.
Karthik RamasamyDepartment of Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Oxford Translational Myeloma Centre, NDORMS, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kazuhito SuzukiDivision of Clinical Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0300-378X
Katja C WeiselUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9422-6614
Paul RichardsonJerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7426-8865

Funding

GSK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceBelantamab mafodotin (belamaf)-containing regimens are effective treatment options for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Ocular events are a common adverse effect of belamaf treatment, which can be managed by physicians, following appropriate training, to minimize their impact on the patient.

objectiveTo develop clinical recommendations for the identification, monitoring, and management of ocular events associated with belamaf therapy, and guidance for any required dose modification. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic literature review was conducted and an international group of hematologists and ophthalmologists reviewed clinical trial data, real-world evidence, and published literature on belamaf-associated ocular events. This literature review and the collective experience and expertise of the panel of experts informed the recommendations.

findingsBelamaf-associated ocular events are common side effects of treatment, which are managed primarily with appropriate dose modification and decreased frequency of dosing, as well as the use of artificial tears. These events affect the corneal epithelium, are mainly Grade 1 and 2 per the Keratopathy and Visual Acuity scale and are reversible in almost all patients. In general, before initiating belamaf therapy, all patients should undergo a baseline ophthalmic evaluation with an eye specialist. However, if there are delays in obtaining ophthalmic evaluation, or if a patient is rapidly progressing, treatment should be initiated, and ophthalmic evaluation should be undertaken as soon as possible. Patients should be also evaluated by an eye specialist before administering the next three belamaf doses (i.e., before Cycles 2, 3, and 4); dose modifications, as described in this paper, may apply if required. Importantly, modifying the belamaf dose in response to an ocular event is not associated with any reductions in treatment efficacy. After Cycle 4, the treating physician may use the Vision-Related Anamnestic tool, alongside clinical judgment, to decide whether to administer the next dose of belamaf or to refer the patient to an eye specialist (i.e., if the patient experiences new worsening of vision or if the ocular events have neither improved after 8 weeks nor resolved after 12 weeks). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The expert panel developed recommendations for managing belamaf-associated ocular events, with the aim of contributing to the ease of clinical use of belamaf and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedEye DiseasesMultiple MyelomaHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedbelantamab mafodotinbelantamab mafodotinclinical recommendationsmultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID40717676
PMCPMC12417747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.