GuidelineAmerican journal of hematology2025
Practical Guidance on Clinical Management of Belantamab Mafodotin-Associated Ocular Events.
Guideline in American journal of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Practical Guidance on Clinical Management of Belantamab Mafodotin-Associated Ocular Events.American journal of hematology · 2025Guideline
- Trial
- Ocular toxicities associated with anticancer drug therapy in Asian patients: a literature review and practical management recommendations for non-ophthalmologic settings.International journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Belantamab mafodotin-associated keratopathy: Clinical outcomes and management from two UK tertiary centres.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Revolutionizing 2L+ Myeloma: A Podcast on the New Era of BCMA-Targeted Bispecific Antibody Therapies.Advances in therapy · 2026Article
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates, T-Cell Engager Bispecific Antibodies and Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Multiple Myeloma: What's the Current Status?Targeted oncology · 2026Review
- Sequencing BCMA- and GPRC5D-targeting immunotherapies in multiple myeloma: Practical guidance from the European Myeloma Network.HemaSphere · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceBelantamab mafodotin (belamaf)-containing regimens are effective treatment options for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Ocular events are a common adverse effect of belamaf treatment, which can be managed by physicians, following appropriate training, to minimize their impact on the patient.
objectiveTo develop clinical recommendations for the identification, monitoring, and management of ocular events associated with belamaf therapy, and guidance for any required dose modification. EVIDENCE REVIEW: A systematic literature review was conducted and an international group of hematologists and ophthalmologists reviewed clinical trial data, real-world evidence, and published literature on belamaf-associated ocular events. This literature review and the collective experience and expertise of the panel of experts informed the recommendations.
findingsBelamaf-associated ocular events are common side effects of treatment, which are managed primarily with appropriate dose modification and decreased frequency of dosing, as well as the use of artificial tears. These events affect the corneal epithelium, are mainly Grade 1 and 2 per the Keratopathy and Visual Acuity scale and are reversible in almost all patients. In general, before initiating belamaf therapy, all patients should undergo a baseline ophthalmic evaluation with an eye specialist. However, if there are delays in obtaining ophthalmic evaluation, or if a patient is rapidly progressing, treatment should be initiated, and ophthalmic evaluation should be undertaken as soon as possible. Patients should be also evaluated by an eye specialist before administering the next three belamaf doses (i.e., before Cycles 2, 3, and 4); dose modifications, as described in this paper, may apply if required. Importantly, modifying the belamaf dose in response to an ocular event is not associated with any reductions in treatment efficacy. After Cycle 4, the treating physician may use the Vision-Related Anamnestic tool, alongside clinical judgment, to decide whether to administer the next dose of belamaf or to refer the patient to an eye specialist (i.e., if the patient experiences new worsening of vision or if the ocular events have neither improved after 8 weeks nor resolved after 12 weeks). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The expert panel developed recommendations for managing belamaf-associated ocular events, with the aim of contributing to the ease of clinical use of belamaf and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.