SynthesisAnaesthesia2025
Consensus recommendations for paediatric airway topicalisation using lidocaine.
Synthesis in Anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Topical Lidocaine During Airway Manipulation in Pediatric Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLidocaine is commonly used to provide airway topicalisation in children. However, there is a paucity of evidence and no guidance available on safe dosing practices.
methodsAn international expert multidisciplinary, multi-society working group conducted a systematic review of the literature, followed by a three-round Delphi process to produce consensus recommendations. These recommendations aim to improve the safety of children having their airways topicalised with lidocaine.
resultsThe systematic review identified 26 articles, with 21 recommendations agreed across five domains of practice: dosing; recovery; adverse reactions; institutional responsibilities; and learning from events. Evidence was limited and mainly grades C and D but the strength of the recommendations, based on the expert consensus, was mainly moderate (65-79% consensus) and strong (≥ 80% consensus). DISCUSSION: It is hoped these consensus recommendations will promote safe practice when lidocaine is used for airway topicalisation in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.