Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717391›Full record

ReviewScandinavian journal of immunology2025

Redefining the Immunobiology of Organ Transplantation for New Clinical Horizons.

Masoud H Manjili

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Scandinavian journal of immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Masoud H ManjiliDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7511-2953

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Renato Martins · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059NIH HHS P30 CA 016059U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH2210793
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional organ transplantation relies on the Self-Non-self (SNS) model of immunity, focusing on donor-recipient compatibility and aggressive immunosuppression to prevent acute rejection. Although effective early, this strategy does not prevent chronic rejection and cannot account for operational tolerance, failure of perfectly HLA-matched grafts, or the occasional spontaneous acceptance of a fully mismatched organ. The adaptation model of immunity offers a different lens. In the thymus, "central adaptation" programs T cells to recognise self-peptide-MHC (pMHC) so they can later recognise different tissues to facilitate tissue repair and homeostasis. Whether a graft thrives or fails depends on how quickly this self-oriented circuitry can operate. Autografts and isografts arrive with their own extracellular-matrix (ECM) "memory", and recipient T cells immediately recognise their pMHC, triggering tissue-remodelling responses. Allografts must adapt to new ECM-a transition that is associated higher levels of graft injury allowing indirect antigen presentation. Until adaptation is complete, recipient T cells mount cytotoxic rather than reparative responses because of antigen cross-presentation, during which the graft relies on donor-derived tissue-resident memory T cells (T

Indexed as

Graft RejectionOrgan TransplantationAnimalsGraft SurvivalHumansImmunologic MemoryT-LymphocytesTransplantation Tolerance

Identifiers

PMID40717391
PMCPMC12301649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.