Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717357›Full record

ReviewBiological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society2025

Animal medical systems from Apis to apes: history, recent advances and future perspectives.

Michelina Pusceddu, Michael A Huffman, Stephane Knoll, Ana Helena Dias Francesconi, Ignazio Floris, Alberto Satta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Feeding ecology and behavioral adaptations shape injury patterns in central European ants.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michelina PuscedduDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39a, Sassari, 07100, Italy.
Michael A HuffmanInstitute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8523, Japan.
Stephane KnollDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39a, Sassari, 07100, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7295-3423
Ana Helena Dias FrancesconiDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39a, Sassari, 07100, Italy.
Ignazio FlorisDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39a, Sassari, 07100, Italy.
Alberto SattaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39a, Sassari, 07100, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal medical systems encompass a wide range of behaviours aimed at maintaining or improving health. It has become clear that these behaviours are not limited to animals treating themselves (self-medication) but also include the treatment of group members, resulting in the adoption of the more inclusive term "animal medication". Behaviour with the intent to avoid, reduce the impact, or otherwise treat disease transmission, rather than the use of medicinal substances, can be described as medical behaviours. However, most behaviours described here involve the ingestion or application of items with medicinal properties to oneself or the application of items to others or their temporary or permanent communal living spaces like nests or burrows, hereto named medicinal or medication behaviours. This review begins with a historical overview of the field, showcasing an increasing awareness of the wide diversity of taxa exhibiting animal medication and elucidating the development of criteria used to define and categorise such behaviours across the animal kingdom. A thorough synthesis of recent research is presented, by providing critical reflection that challenges conventional notions and emphasises the significance of sociality and ecological context. To this end, medical systems are explored by using numerous examples, thus highlighting the diverse strategies animals employ to maintain health and improve fitness, ranging from honey bees foraging on antimicrobial resin to control hive disease to apes ingesting small amounts of toxic secondary compounds to control parasite infection. The understanding of how animals maintain their health through medical strategies offers valuable insights into the evolutionary origin and complexity of the drivers behind these behaviours. Evidence suggests that advanced cognition is not necessarily a prerequisite because innate mechanisms are likely involved in the expression of these behaviours across the animal kingdom. By highlighting the importance of life-history traits and ecological context in predicting animal medical systems, we reassess the presumed primary drivers of these adaptations. Finally, this review raises important questions about animal medical systems, including the universality of the mechanisms involved, the evolutionary significance of parasite pressure, and the ecological implications of this suite of behaviours. By addressing these complexities, this review provides a nuanced understanding of animal medical systems and highlights avenues for future research in this field.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalHominidaeAnimalsecological adaptationslife historymedical behavioursmedication behaviourssociality

Identifiers

PMID40717357
PMCPMC12586310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.