Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717265›Full record

ReviewPain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain2025

14. Discogenic Low Back Pain.

Wouter K M van Os, Ricardo Alvarez-Jimenez, Steven P Cohen, Milan P Stojanovic, Ricardo Ruiz-Lopez, Jan Van Zundert, Jan Willem Kallewaard

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. TRPC6-Mediated CaCells · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. 14. Discogenic Low Back Pain.Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wouter K M van OsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ricardo Alvarez-JimenezDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7581-7566
Steven P CohenAnesthesiology, Neurology, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Milan P StojanovicDepartment of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine Service, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ricardo Ruiz-LopezSpine and Pain Surgery, Clinica Vertebra, Barcelona, Spain.
Jan Van ZundertDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5389-2036
Jan Willem KallewaardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDiscogenic low back pain can be severely disabling, clinically challenging to diagnose, and expensive to treat. Disc degeneration is characterized by disc dehydration, which diminishes the ability of the disc to distribute pressure, making it more susceptible to damage, and leading to annular tears, fissures, and a higher incidence of herniation. Furthermore, the abnormal annular in-growth of nerves and inflammation of the disc increase the number and sensitivity of nociceptors, leading to chronic discogenic low back pain (CDLBP). The purpose of this article was to review the current literature.

methodsIn this narrative review, the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of discogenic low back pain was summarized.

resultsSymptoms and findings during physical examination may guide the diagnostic process but are not specific or sensitive regarding CDLBP. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can rule out other pathology and provides a basis for the decision about whether to perform pressure-controlled provocative discography, the current diagnostic standard. Conservative care includes pain education programs, structured exercise therapies, psychological interventions, and pharmacological treatment. Various minimally invasive interventional treatment strategies for refractory CDLBP exist, of which biacuplasty or cooled radiofrequency can be used as therapeutic options. Promising new treatments include intradiscal injection of mesenchymal stem cells and platelet-rich plasma, radiofrequency ablation of the sinuvertebral and basivertebral nerves, dorsal root ganglion stimulation, and spinal cord stimulation. Future research regarding the safety and efficacy of these treatments should include large randomized controlled trials with strict inclusion criteria and longer follow-up periods. A primary focus should be on increasing the evidence base for diagnosing discogenic low back pain.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationLow Back PainHumanschronic discogenic low back paindiscographyevidence‐based medicineinterventional therapyintradiscal therapy

Identifiers

PMID40717265
PMCPMC12301617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.