ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025
Horizontal Gene Transfer Inference: Gene Presence-Absence Outperforms Gene Trees.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Horizontal gene transfer in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and other Saccharomycotina yeasts: a review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- A protein interactome for the last eukaryotic common ancestor illuminates the biochemical basis of modern genetic diseases.Cell genomics · 2026Article
- Genomic and phenotypic characterization of Vibrio cholerae strain SU109: a genomic investigation of a shrimp-associated strain from Bangladesh.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- New potential antimicrobial peptides with mirror-symmetrical structure in fungi and insects.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Linking humans and the environment in the spread of antimicrobial resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- CORGIAS: identifying correlated gene pairs by considering evolutionary history in a large-scale prokaryotic genome dataset.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Horizontal gene transfer is a fundamental driver of prokaryotic evolution, facilitating the acquisition of novel traits and adaptation to new environments. Despite its importance, methods for inferring horizontal gene transfer are rarely systematically compared, leaving a gap in our understanding of their relative strengths and limitations. Validating horizontal gene transfer inference methods is challenging due to the absence of a genomic fossil record that could confirm historical transfer events. Without an empirical gold standard, new inference methods are typically validated using simulated data; however, these simulations may not accurately capture biological complexity and often embed the same assumptions used in the inference methods themselves. Here, we leverage the tendency of horizontal gene transfer events to involve multiple neighboring genes to assess the accuracy of diverse horizontal gene transfer inference methods. We show that methods analyzing gene family presence/absence patterns across species trees consistently outperform approaches based on gene tree-species tree reconciliation. Our findings challenge the prevailing assumption that explicit phylogenetic reconciliation methods are superior to simpler implicit methods. By providing a comprehensive benchmark, we offer practical recommendations for selecting appropriate methods and indicate avenues for future methodological advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.