Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717244›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2025

Horizontal Gene Transfer Inference: Gene Presence-Absence Outperforms Gene Trees.

Swastik Mishra, Martin J Lercher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Swastik MishraInstitute for Computer Science and Department of Biology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-4107-6384
Martin J LercherInstitute for Computer Science and Department of Biology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3940-1621

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Horizontal gene transfer is a fundamental driver of prokaryotic evolution, facilitating the acquisition of novel traits and adaptation to new environments. Despite its importance, methods for inferring horizontal gene transfer are rarely systematically compared, leaving a gap in our understanding of their relative strengths and limitations. Validating horizontal gene transfer inference methods is challenging due to the absence of a genomic fossil record that could confirm historical transfer events. Without an empirical gold standard, new inference methods are typically validated using simulated data; however, these simulations may not accurately capture biological complexity and often embed the same assumptions used in the inference methods themselves. Here, we leverage the tendency of horizontal gene transfer events to involve multiple neighboring genes to assess the accuracy of diverse horizontal gene transfer inference methods. We show that methods analyzing gene family presence/absence patterns across species trees consistently outperform approaches based on gene tree-species tree reconciliation. Our findings challenge the prevailing assumption that explicit phylogenetic reconciliation methods are superior to simpler implicit methods. By providing a comprehensive benchmark, we offer practical recommendations for selecting appropriate methods and indicate avenues for future methodological advancements.

Indexed as

Gene Transfer, HorizontalEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticPhylogenyexplicit phylogenetic methodsgene presence–absence profilesHGT inferencehorizontal gene transferimplicit phylogenetic methodsreconciliation models

Identifiers

PMID40717244
PMCPMC12301182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.