ArticleBrain tumor pathology2025
Integrated analysis of MYC expression, 8q24.21 copy number, and recurrence patterns in astrocytoma, IDH-mutant.
Article in Brain tumor pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- MYC as a key target for melanoma therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compared to oligodendrogliomas, astrocytomas may have a relatively higher frequency of intracranial remote recurrence, despite generally favorable prognoses. Previous studies identified 8q gain, particularly in the terminal region, as a poor prognostic factor. This study evaluated MYC expression and its relationship with copy number gain at 8q24.21, in relation to recurrence patterns in astrocytomas, with a particular focus on intracranial remote recurrence. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 27 patients treated between 2006 and 2019. MYC expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and copy number status by metaphase comparative genomic hybridization and next-generation sequencing. Recurrence patterns were categorized as local or remote.Among 43 specimens analyzed by IHC, MYC expression was observed in 72%, with higher positivity in recurrent (80%) than initial (61%) specimens, though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.30). Copy number analysis showed a significant increase in 8q24.21 copy number in specimens from cases with remote recurrence compared to those with local recurrence (p = 0.033). However, no significant correlation was found between MYC copy number and protein expression (p = 0.055). These findings suggest that MYC is frequently expressed in astrocytomas, but its expression does not significantly reflect 8q gain or recurrence pattern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40717203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.