Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717162›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Surgical Choice among Women with a First Breast Cancer and Pathogenic Variants in Breast Cancer Genes.

Lauren Kerivan, Jamie Wagner, Lauren Nye, Christa Balanoff, Elizabeth Jeffers, Lyndsey Kilgore, Kelsey Larson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren KerivanMedical Center, Department of Surgery, University of Kansas, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Jamie WagnerDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Lauren NyeDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS, USA.
Christa BalanoffDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Elizabeth JeffersDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Lyndsey KilgoreDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Kelsey LarsonDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS, USA. klarson6@kumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1977-9459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient choice regarding risk-reducing mastectomy in the setting of a new breast cancer diagnosis is not well documented. The objective of this study was to evaluate patterns in surgical treatment choices among women with a first breast cancer diagnosis and a breast cancer susceptibility gene mutation.

methodsWe conducted a single-center, retrospective analysis of women with unilateral, stage 0-III breast cancer and a high (BRCA1/2, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, TP53) or moderate (ATM, BARD1, CHEK2, RAD51C/D) penetrance gene mutation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM).

resultsOf the 132 patients included, 52% had BRCA1/2 mutations, 8% had other high penetrance mutations, and 40% had moderate penetrance mutations. Most underwent bilateral mastectomy (80%), followed by lumpectomy (15%). Women who underwent CRRM were younger and more likely to be non-smokers (p < 0.001). CRRM rates differed significantly across genes: BRCA1 (90%), ATM (89%), BRCA2 (84%), CHEK2 (67%), PALB2 (63%) [p = 0.048]. Women with moderate penetrance mutations were significantly less likely to undergo CRRM than BRCA1/2 carriers (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.69; p = 0.011)

conclusionsIn this cohort of women with a first breast cancer and pathogenic or likely pathogenic gene variants, we identified differing rates of CRRM across high and moderate penetrance gene mutations. While the odds of CRRM receipt were significantly lower for those with moderate penetrance mutations compared with those with BRCA1/2 mutations, the high uptake of CRRM in CHEK2 and ATM carriers is noteworthy given the lack of consensus regarding surgical management options for women with non-BRCA mutations.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseMastectomyMutationProphylactic MastectomyAdultAgedBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPenetrancePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.