ArticleScientific reports2025
An efficient deep learning approach with frequency and channel optimization for underwater acoustic target recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ship radiated noise (SRN) recognition is challenging due to environmental noise and the broad frequency range of underwater signals. Existing deep learning models often include irrelevant frequencies and use red, green, and blue (RGB) channel configurations in convolutional networks, which are unsuitable for SRN data and computationally intensive. To address these limitations, we propose FCResNet5, a neural network optimized for SRN classification. FCResNet5 adopts a streamlined architecture that focuses on the critical frequency band and applies frequency channelization to enhance spectral representation. Its compact design achieves greater computational efficiency while maintaining comparable accuracy. Ablation studies confirm the contribution of each component, and comparative results demonstrate that FCResNet5 offers a more efficient alternative to existing models without compromising performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.