Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717149›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Real time weed identification with enhanced mobilevit model for mobile devices.

Xiaoyan Liu, Qingru Sui, Zhihui Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoyan LiuChangchun Sci-Tech University, Changchun, 130600, China.
Qingru SuiChangchun Sci-Tech University, Changchun, 130600, China. 100185@cstu.edu.cn.
Zhihui ChenChangchun Sci-Tech University, Changchun, 130600, China.

Funding

The Science Technology Research Project of Jilin Provincial Department of Education--Research on rice seedling growth monitoring based on computer vision JJKH20241706KJ
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning model optimization have notably enhanced weed identification accuracy. However, there is a short-fall in detailed research on optimizing models for weed identification with images from mobile embedded systems. Also, existing methods generally use large, slow multi-layer convolutional networks (CNNs), which are impractical for use on mobile embedded devices. To address those issues, we propose a lightweight weed identification model based on an enhanced MobileViT architecture, effectively balancing high accuracy with real-time performance. Our approach begins with the application of a multi-scale retinal enhancement algorithm featuring color restoration to preprocess image data. This step improves the clarity of images, particularly those with blurred edges or significant shadow interference. Following this, we introduce an optimized MobileViT model that incorporates the Efficient Channel Attention (ECA) module into the weed feature extraction network. This design ensures robust feature extraction capabilities while simultaneously reducing the model's parameters and computational complexity. The MobileViT model within our feature extraction network is engineered to concurrently learn local and global semantic information. This capability allows it to accurately distinguish subtle differences between weeds and crops by leveraging a minimal number of modules. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our model, it achieved an F1 score of 98.51% and an average identification time of 89 milliseconds per image. These results underscore its suitability for lightweight deployment, maintaining high accuracy while minimizing model complexity.

Indexed as

CNNEmbedded devicesMobileViTModel optimizationWeed identification

Identifiers

PMID40717149
PMCPMC12301468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.