ArticleScientific reports2025
Improvement of English-Chinese bilingual learning by integrating semantic analysis and neural machine translation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Semantic convergence in culturally loaded text translation by Large Language Models: a cross-model empirical analysis of English translations ofFrontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To improve the effectiveness of English-Chinese bilingual learning, this study introduces an optimization model that combines semantic analysis with neural machine translation (NMT). A series of comprehensive experiments were conducted to evaluate its performance. The results demonstrated that the proposed model outperformed existing approaches across multiple key metrics, including reading comprehension, translation accuracy, and learning efficiency. Specifically, the optimized model achieved a reading comprehension score of 85.0, a grammar accuracy rate of 82.5%, and a vocabulary score of 80.1. For translation performance, it attained a sentence-level accuracy of 84.3%, paragraph coherence of 81.5%, and a cultural understanding score of 78.9. In terms of learning efficiency, the model reduced average learning time to 45.3 min, reached a knowledge retention rate of 80.2%, and improved autonomous learning ability to 78.5%. Learner satisfaction also improved, with an interest level score of 4.3, a teaching method satisfaction score of 4.0, and an overall satisfaction score of 4.2 (on a 5-point scale). Compared with rule-based translation systems and models using word embeddings or basic neural networks, the proposed model demonstrated clear advantages in all areas of evaluation. Overall, this study offers a valuable contribution to the advancement of computer-assisted language learning technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.