ArticleScientific reports2025
Computational studies on structural aspects of pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine derivatives as TRKA inhibitors in cancer therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal characterization of a pyrazolo[3,4-RSC advances · 2026Article
- Potent LeuBAT inhibitors designed in silico as next-generation duloxetine analogs for enhanced major depressive disorder treatment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tropomyosin receptor kinases (TRKs) play a crucial role in nerve development, and their dysregulation due to genetic alterations, such as NTRK fusions, has been linked to various cancers. Recently, TRKs have emerged as effective therapeutic targets. However, resistance to these therapies presents significant challenges. In this study, a series of pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine derivatives were analyzed to generate pharmacophore-based models, conduct molecular docking, perform molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and evaluate absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET). The generated pharmacophore hypothesis, ADRR_1, identified essential characteristics required for biological activity. Molecular docking was carried out on 37 ligands, yielding docking scores ranging from -12.672 to -14.169 kcal/mol. The best fit was observed for ligand L5, which formed five conventional hydrogen bonds with residues Glu546, Met620, Lys627, and Lys572. Additionally, three carbon-hydrogen bonds were established between the pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine moiety and residues Gly623, Glu618, and Asp703. MD simulations further confirmed the stability of the TRKA-L5 complex, underscoring the robust interactions between L5 and the target protein. The virtual screening study used 453 ligands from the ZINC database and identified the hit ligand ZINC000013331109, which exhibited a docking score of -10.775 kcal/mol and demonstrated good binding affinity with key amino acids. All screened ZINC hits adhered to the Lipinski Rule of Five (Ro5), and notably, ZINC000013331109 did not exhibit hepatotoxicity, unlike the top-scoring ligands and entrectinib, which were associated with liver toxicity. This study highlights the potential of ZINC000013331109 as a promising candidate for TRKA inhibition. Further research is warranted to explore the efficacy and safety of this ligand in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.