ArticleScientific reports2025
Redistribution and enhanced bioavailability of rare earth elements speciation induced by mining-driven transformation in ionic rare earth mining areas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Light Rare Earth Elements in Plants: Environmental Sources, Bioavailability, Uptake, Nutrient Interactions, Mechanisms, and Concentration-Dependent Physiological and Signaling Reactions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Heavy Metal-Contaminated Soils and Gastric Cancer Risk: Molecular Insights and the Relevance of a One Health Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Ecological Imprint of Rare Earth Mining on Microbial Communities and Water Quality Across Depth and Distance Gradients in Ganzhou, China.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mining is an anthropogenic activity, that alters rare earth elements (REEs) distribution, changes the ecological environment of mining areas, and pollutes surrounding areas. However, the impacts of mining activities on REEs distribution and chemical morphological changes in mining soils are still poorly understood. In the present study, REEs fractionation and chemical speciation in both mining and unexploited soils were investigated through BCR sequential extraction. Most of the soil samples presented positive cerium (Ce) anomalies and negative europium (Eu) anomalies. The ratios of light rare earth elements (LREEs) to heavy rare earth elements (HREEs) and the total rare earth elements (TREEs) contents in mining soil were lower than those in unexploited soil. In unexploited soils, REEs were dominated by the residual fraction, and the exchangeable fraction was the lowest, accounting for 50.85-91.41% and 0.15-13.02% of TREEs, respectively. Mining activities modified REEs chemical speciations, which notably increased the exchangeable fraction (0.47-56.00%) and decreased the residual fraction (4.62-65.01%) in mining areas. Moreover, the reducible fraction also significantly increased in mining soils, accounting for 21.15-63.29% of TREEs. Compared with the unexploited areas, the relationships between soil properties and REEs distribution in mining areas were more pronounced. However, mining activities exerted little effect on the chemical speciation of Fe and Al, and the proportions of the residual fraction were dominant both before and after mining. These results demonstrated that mining activities decreased the contents of TREEs, redistributed REEs chemical morphological patterns, and increased their mobility and bioavailability, which are the principal anthropogenic sources of REEs entering environments and increase the risk of soil pollution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.