ArticleNPJ science of learning2025
Analyzing the network structure of students' motivation to learn AI: a self-determination theory perspective.
Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motivational and demotivational teaching styles in physical education: the role of basic psychological needs.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Validating the AIM-N: An AI-motivation and needs scale with multi-group invariance and MIMIC-DIF evidence in higher education.PloS one · 2026Article
- From surviving to thriving: a process-ecological model of psychological resilience in doctoral students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation is a key driver of learning. Prior work on motivation has mostly focused on conventional learning contexts that did not necessarily involve AI. Hence, little is known about students' motivation to learn AI. This study examined the structure of students' AI motivational system using self-determination theory as the theoretical framework. Self-determination theory posits that there are qualitatively distinct types of motivation, including intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. Students' motivation, in turn, is strongly shaped by whether their basic psychological needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness are satisfied. We used network analysis to explore the structure of students' AI motivation. Participants included 1465 students from 47 universities. Introjected regulation was central to the AI motivational system but intrinsic motivation was less central. This meant that many students learned AI primarily out of guilt or shame and not because of personal enjoyment. Furthermore, competence satisfaction seemed more important than autonomy and relatedness satisfaction in AI-enriched learning environments. Hence, key practical implications include the need to have clear goals and standards as well as to build students' competence in using AI tools. This study enriches the AI education literature by focusing on students' motivational systems and suggesting ways to cultivate better engagement with AI.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.