Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717116›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2025

Analyzing the network structure of students' motivation to learn AI: a self-determination theory perspective.

Jiajing Li, Jianhua Zhang, Ching Sing Chai, Vivian W Y Lee, Xuesong Zhai, Xingwei Wang, Ronnel B King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jiajing LiCollege of Education for the Future, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai, China.
Jianhua ZhangDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ching Sing ChaiDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Vivian W Y LeeCentre for Learning Enhancement And Research, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xuesong ZhaiCollege of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xingwei WangSchool of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Ronnel B KingDepartment of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. rbking@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1723-1748

Funding

Beijing Normal University 310425209503Chinese University of Hong Kong 3200348Chinese University of Hong Kong 4171077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation is a key driver of learning. Prior work on motivation has mostly focused on conventional learning contexts that did not necessarily involve AI. Hence, little is known about students' motivation to learn AI. This study examined the structure of students' AI motivational system using self-determination theory as the theoretical framework. Self-determination theory posits that there are qualitatively distinct types of motivation, including intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, and amotivation. Students' motivation, in turn, is strongly shaped by whether their basic psychological needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness are satisfied. We used network analysis to explore the structure of students' AI motivation. Participants included 1465 students from 47 universities. Introjected regulation was central to the AI motivational system but intrinsic motivation was less central. This meant that many students learned AI primarily out of guilt or shame and not because of personal enjoyment. Furthermore, competence satisfaction seemed more important than autonomy and relatedness satisfaction in AI-enriched learning environments. Hence, key practical implications include the need to have clear goals and standards as well as to build students' competence in using AI tools. This study enriches the AI education literature by focusing on students' motivational systems and suggesting ways to cultivate better engagement with AI.

Identifiers

PMID40717116
PMCPMC12301463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.