Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717104›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing base fluid composition for PEMFC cooling: A machine learning approach to balance thermal and rheological performance.

Praveen Kumar Kanti, Prashantha Kumar H G, Nejla Mahjoub Said, V Vicki Wanatasanappan, Prabhu Paramasivam, Leliso Hobicho Dabelo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Praveen Kumar KantiInstitute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, IKRAM-UNITEN, Jalan, 43000, Selangor, Malaysia.
Prashantha Kumar H GDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Dayananda Sagar University (DSU), Bangalore, 560056, India.
Nejla Mahjoub SaidDepartment of Physics, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, 61413, Saudi Arabia.
V Vicki WanatasanappanInstitute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, IKRAM-UNITEN, Jalan, 43000, Selangor, Malaysia. vignesh@uniten.edu.my.
Prabhu ParamasivamDepartment of Research and Innovation, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, Chennai, 602105, Tamil Nadu, India. lptprabhu@gmail.com.
Leliso Hobicho DabeloDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Mattu University, Mettu-318, Mettu, Ethiopia. leliso.hobicho@meu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell (PEMFC) is a highly efficient and eco-friendly technology, making it a pivotal solution for sustainable energy systems. Effective thermal management of PEMFCs is essential, and nanofluids have emerged as superior coolants compared to conventional fluids. Less exploration in PEMFC cooling, particularly using reduced graphene oxide (rGO) suspended hybrid nanofluids, supports the present work on the thermal and rheological properties of rGO-based hybrid nanofluids. The experimental exploration involves five different mixtures of base fluid composition comprising ethylene glycol (EG) and water (W). The hybridization of Al₂O₃ and rGO nanoparticles was performed by dispersing both at four different concentrations in the 50:50 base fluid mixture. The experimental procedure involves evaluation of dispersion stability, viscosity, and thermal conductivity of hybrid nanofluids. The results showed that increasing the EG proportion reduced thermal conductivity while increasing viscosity. The maximum thermal conductivity ratio of 1.23 occurred at 80:20 W: EG for 1 vol% concentration at 60 °C, while the highest viscosity ratio of 1.48 was observed at 20:80 W: EG at 30 °C. The developed correlation for viscosity shows an 11.2% reduction in the coefficient of determination obtained for the thermal conductivity model. This study explores the application of Linear Regression (LR), Decision Tree (DT), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) models for predicting thermal conductivity and viscosity using experimental datasets. The thermal conductivity model showed that XGBoost has the best predictive power, with Test R² = 0.9941, Test mean square error (MSE) = 0.0000, and Test KGE = 0.9613. XGBoost again beat other models in predicting viscosity, with Test R² = 0.9944, Test MSE = 0.0269, and Test KGE = 0.9903. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations (LIME) graphs showed that the model outputs were greatly affected by the base fluid ratio (BFR), temperature, and concentration. This made the model outputs easy to understand both globally and locally. These findings provide valuable insights for designing efficient cooling solutions for PEMFCs, supporting their broader adoption in energy applications.

Indexed as

Aluminium oxideProton exchange membrane fuel cellReduced graphene oxideThermal conductivityViscosity

Identifiers

PMID40717104
PMCPMC12301441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.