Observational studyBiomedical engineering online2025
Postoperative outcome analysis of chronic rhinosinusitis using transfer learning with pre-trained foundation models based on endoscopic images: a multicenter, observational study.
Observational study in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study developed a foundation model-based analytical framework for the analysis of postoperative endoscopic images in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The framework leverages the standardized identification and reproducible results enabled by artificial intelligence algorithms, combined with the strengths of pre-trained foundation models in developing downstream applications. This approach effectively addresses the inherent challenge of strong subjectivity in conventional postoperative endoscopic evaluation for CRS.
methodsThe postoperative sinus cavity status in CRS was classified into three states: "polyp", "edema", and "smooth", to establish an endoscopic image dataset. Using transfer learning based on pre-trained large models for endoscopic images, we developed an analytical model for postoperative outcome evaluation in CRS. Comparative studies with various traditional training methods were conducted to evaluate this approach, demonstrating that it can achieve satisfactory model performance even with limited datasets.
resultsThe endoscopic image-based pre-trained transfer learning model proposed in this study demonstrates significant advantages over conventional methods in diagnostic performance. In the precision evaluation for distinguishing smooth mucosa from rest conditions (edema and polyps), our model achieved mean accuracy and AUC values of 91.17% and 0.97, respectively, with specificity reaching 86.35% and sensitivity attaining 91.85%. This represents an approximate 4% improvement in mean accuracy compared to traditional algorithms. Notably, in the differential diagnosis between polyps and rest conditions (smooth mucosa and edema), the proposed algorithm attained mean accuracy and AUC values of 81.87% and 0.90, respectively, demonstrating specificity of 80.53% and sensitivity of 81.04%. This configuration shows a substantial 15% enhancement in mean accuracy relative to conventional diagnostic approaches.
conclusionThe transfer learning algorithm model based on pre-trained foundation models can provide accurate and reproducible analysis of postoperative outcomes in CRS, effectively addressing the issue of high subjectivity in postoperative evaluation. With limited data, our model can achieve better generalization performance compared to traditional algorithms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.