Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40717042›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of nutrition2025

Whole grain intake remains unchanged in the UK, 2008/2012-2016/2019.

Inga Kutepova, Colin D Rehm, Samara Joy Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Inga KutepovaLife Sciences, PepsiCo R&D, Reading, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2478-6127
Colin D RehmLife Sciences, PepsiCo R&D, Purchase, NY, USA.
Samara Joy SmithLife Sciences, PepsiCo R&D, Purchase, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address limited data on whole grain (WG) consumption in the UK, we investigated trends and socio-demographic patterns of WG consumption from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey from 2008/2012 to 2016/2019 and examined the relationship between WG and dietary intakes. We analysed 15 655 individuals aged ≥ 1·5 years who completed a 4-day food diary. WG consumption was quantified by estimating the WG content of individual foods using publicly available ingredient information. Survey-weighted mean WG consumption over time and by population sub-group was calculated. Survey-weighted trend tests and Wald tests were used. Total WG intake in the general population did not change from 2008/2012 to 2016/2019. WG from high-fibre cereals and bread declined by 16·2 % (11·1-9·3 g/d) and 19·4 % (12·4-10 g/d), respectively, while other cereals (e.g. rice/pasta) increased by 72·5 % (4·0-6·9 g/d), but contributed considerably less than other categories. In the most recent data (2016-2019), older adults (65+ years) had the highest energy-adjusted WG consumption, followed by children 1·5-3 years. Individuals with lower incomes, adolescents and current smokers consumed the least WG. Whole grain intake was associated with generally higher quality diets, specifically consuming more fibre, potassium, Ca, Fe, Mg, fruits/vegetables, pulses/nuts and oily fish and consuming less free sugars, total fat, saturated fat, Na and red/processed meat (

Indexed as

DietWhole GrainsAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDietary FiberDiet RecordsFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysUnited KingdomDietary FiberNational Diet and Nutrition SurveyUKWhole grains

Identifiers

PMID40717042
PMCPMC12492063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.