Observational studyClinical & experimental ophthalmology2025
Outcomes After Switching to Faricimab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Data From the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.
Observational study in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-Life 1-Year Results and Predictors of Visual Outcome with Intravitreal Faricimab for Treatment of Exudative Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes and Choroidal Vascular Structural Changes After Switching to Faricimab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes After Switching to Faricimab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Data From the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Switching from Aflibercept to Faricimab in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Short-Term Results from Real-Life Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to describe 1-year outcomes of eyes switched to faricimab from first-generation vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) in routine care.
methodsMulticentre, observational study of 383 eyes tracked in the Fight Retinal Blindness! registry switched to faricimab from aflibercept 2 mg, ranibizumab, or bevacizumab between 1st January-1st August 2023 in Australia.
resultsOne-year completion rates were high (335/383 [88%]). The proportion of choroidal neovascular (CNV) lesions graded as inactive increased from 39% at switch to 63% at 12 months (p < 0.01). Mean visual acuity (95% Confidence Interval) decreased from 70.0 (68.6, 71.5) to 68.4 (66.7, 70.1) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution letters (both approx. 6/12). Mean treatment intervals increased from 7.2 to 10.5 weeks (p < 0.01). Eyes with active CNV at switch maintained mean VA -0.5 (-1.7, +0.7) letters; 50% were inactivated at 12 months. Eyes with inactive CNV at switch lost -3.5 (-5.0, -1.9) letters; 15% had reactivation at 12 months. Switchback occurred in 64/383 eyes (17%), predominantly to aflibercept 2 mg, that lost -1.9 letters without interval change at 12 months. Adverse outcomes were in keeping with previous reports, with no cases of occlusive retinal vasculitis.
conclusionsWe found that faricimab inactivated a significant proportion of CNV lesions that had been active using 1st generation VEGF inhibitors, with a significant extension of the treatment interval. A small reduction in VA occurred in switchers and eyes not switched through the same period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.