Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40716773›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

A systematic review of reviews on comprehensive community initiatives to prevent or reduce alcohol and other drug harms.

Peter John Gates, Andrea C Zocco, Sara Farnbach

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter John GatesNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6220-4007
Andrea C ZoccoNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Sara FarnbachNational Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

National Drug and Alcohol Research CentreNew South Wales Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsComprehensive community initiatives (CCI) aimed at reducing or preventing alcohol or other drug (AOD) harms incorporate multiple initiatives delivered to whole communities to effect community-level change on sociocultural and environmental factors. CCIs have gained in popularity and have been subject to extensive research; however, CCIs comprise multiple initiatives and evidence for effectiveness by substance type has been mixed. This umbrella review aimed to synthesise information from published reviews to describe the combination of CCIs with the most consistent evidence for impact for each substance type.

methodWe searched Embase/Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, two online registries and hand searched references for English language reviews without date restriction and conducted an umbrella review using mixed methods synthesis (PROSPERO CRD42023432567). We considered all types of reviews focused on CCIs and addressing AOD use or harms. Two reviewers independently screened all articles and conducted full text review. Extraction of main results relating to CCI impact and quality assessment using AMSTAR-2 and SANRA was completed by two independent reviewers and corrected covered area analysis conducted.

resultsWe identified 87 reviews spanning three decades; 14 were rated high quality. Most reviews considered individual substances [alcohol (43 reviews) or tobacco (35 reviews) and rarely illicit drugs (16 reviews)], and some limited scope to 'at-risk' community members [young people (26 reviews) and First Nations (8 reviews)]. Although the evidence did not meet criteria for consistent impact, communities should consider implementing school-based (supported by 36 of 50 reviews) and parenting-related (29 of 37 reviews) activities that are supported by media campaign where feasible (29 of 51 reviews). CCIs have the most consistent impact on alcohol (supported by 24 of 32 reviews) and tobacco-related outcomes (22 of 35 reviews), though illicit drugs are yet to be adequately assessed.

conclusionsAlthough the available evidence regarding comprehensive community initiatives is largely inconsistent, the addition of parenting-related activities to existing school-based education campaigns is likely to improve effectiveness. A media campaign may extend their reach to those outside school settings. Future evaluation of CCIs should measure impact of activities in isolation where possible and incorporate process measures to gauge community engagement and empowerment.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingHarm ReductionSubstance-Related DisordersHumansalcoholcommunitycomprehensivedrugsimpactprevention

Identifiers

PMID40716773
PMCPMC12779595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.