Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40716756›Full record

ArticleJournal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society2025

Controversial Nomenclature in Peptide Synthesis: A Call for Clarity.

Anamika Sharma, Ashish Kumar, Beatriz G de la Torre, Fernando Albericio

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Controversial Nomenclature in Peptide Synthesis: A Call for Clarity.Journal of peptide science : an official publication of the European Peptide Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anamika SharmaPeptide Science Laboratory, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Ashish KumarPeptide Science Laboratory, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Beatriz G de la TorreKwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform (KRISP), School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Fernando AlbericioPeptide Science Laboratory, School of Chemistry and Physics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8946-0462

Funding

National Research Foundation and the University of KwaZulu-Natal
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various approaches to make peptides have been adopted globally owing to their high demand. The three main approaches commonly used for this purpose are solution synthesis, also called classical solution-phase peptide synthesis (CSPS), solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), and liquid-phase peptide synthesis (LPPS). Each method offers unique advantages: CSPS for scalability, SPPS for automation and efficiency, and LPPS for combining solution-phase simplicity with iterative synthesis using soluble tags.

Indexed as

PeptidesTerminology as TopicSolid-Phase Synthesis TechniquesPeptides

Identifiers

PMID40716756
PMCPMC12301071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.