ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2025
Interpretable framework for predicting preoperative cardiorespiratory fitness using wearable data.
Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Reactive to Proactive Healthcare: Synergizing Wearable Biomarkers and Machine Learning in Digital Therapeutics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled clinical decision support systems in preadmission testing: a scoping review of risk prediction, triage, and perioperative workflows (2020-2025).Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Domain-Aware Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Predicting Postoperative Hospital Length of Stay from Perioperative Data: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating wearable technology with the 6 minute walk test to evaluate COPD patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Longitudinal wearable sensor data enhance precision of Long COVID detection.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPredicting preoperative cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is crucial for assessing the risk of complications and adverse outcomes in patients undergoing surgery. CRF is formally evaluated through submaximal exercise testing with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) or the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). However, formal CRF testing is impractical as a preoperative screening tool. Wrist-worn devices with actigraphy and heart rate monitoring have become increasingly capable of predicting physiological measurements. Our aim was to develop a clinically interpretable machine learning (ML) model using wearable-derived physiological data to predict CRF for older adults, and to access whether this model can accurately estimate the 6MWT distances for preoperative risk evaluation.
methodsWe examined heart rate and activity data collected from Fitbit devices worn by older adults (N = 65) who were scheduled to undergo major noncardiac surgery. Data collection took place over a 1-week period prior to surgery while participants engaged in their typical daily activities. Our primary aim was to leverage this wearable technology to forecast CRF among this group. We employed a machine-learning ensemble regression model to predict CRF, using 6MWT outcomes as an index. Further, we applied the shapley feature attribution approach to gain insights into how specific features derived from wearable data contribute to CRF prediction within the model, aiding in personalized fitness prediction.
resultsAdults with higher CRF exhibited elevated levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), maximal activity energy expenditure (aEE
conclusionThe integration of wearable data-driven activity and heart rate metrics forms the basis for utilizing wearables to provide preoperative cardiorespiratory fitness assessments, supporting surgical risk stratification, personalized prehabilitation, and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.