ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2025
Optimization of deep learning models for inference in low resource environments.
Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI), and particularly deep learning (DL), has shown great promise to revolutionize healthcare. However, clinical translation is often hindered by demanding hardware requirements. In this study, we assess the effectiveness of optimization techniques for DL models in healthcare applications, targeting varying AI workloads across the domains of radiology, histopathology, and medical RGB imaging, while evaluating across hardware configurations. The assessed AI workloads focus on both segmentation and classification workloads, by virtue of brain extraction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), colorectal cancer delineation in Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E) stained digitized tissue sections, and diabetic foot ulcer classification in RGB images. We quantitatively evaluate model performance in terms of model runtime during inference (including speedup, latency, and memory usage) and model utility on unseen data. Our results demonstrate that optimization techniques can substantially improve model runtime, without compromising model utility. These findings suggest that optimization techniques can facilitate the clinical translation of AI models in low-resource environments, making them more practical for real-world healthcare applications even in underserved regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.