Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40716143›Full record

ArticleVaccine2025

Tinnitus risk after COVID-19 XBB.1.5 vaccination: A self-controlled case series study.

Stanley Xu, Lina S Sy, Vennis Hong, Lei Qian, Kimberly J Holmquist, Katia J Bruxvoort, Bing Han, Bruno Lewin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stanley XuDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA; Department of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA. Electronic address: Stan.Xu@kp.org.
Lina S SyDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Vennis HongDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Lei QianDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Kimberly J HolmquistDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Katia J BruxvoortDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA; School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Bing HanDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Bruno LewinDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, USA; Department of Clinical Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Funding

A risk-varying and perturbed self-controlled case series design for assessing the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in a large health care systemR01AI168209 · NIAID · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI XU, STANLEY · 2022 to 2025
$2.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI168209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile prior studies found no clear evidence of an association between COVID-19 vaccination and tinnitus, concerns about a potential link remain. This study assessed the risk of tinnitus following COVID-19 XBB.1.5 vaccination, administered alone or coadministered with influenza vaccine, using the event-dependent self-controlled case series (SCCS) design.

methodsWe conducted an SCCS study among individuals aged ≥12 years enrolled at Kaiser Permanente Southern California, with tinnitus events occurring between September 1, 2023, and March 31, 2024. The exposures included Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 XBB.1.5 vaccines, with or without influenza vaccine coadministration. The primary outcome was first-ever tinnitus (no documented history before September 1, 2023), and the secondary outcome was first-in-1-year tinnitus, identified using ICD-10 code H93.1* in inpatient, emergency department, and outpatient settings. Risk intervals were pre-specified as 1-14 days and 1-28 days after vaccination, with person-time outside the risk interval serving as the control interval. Relative incidences (RI) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated, adjusting for seasonality by including tinnitus events among non-recipients of COVID-19 XBB.1.5 vaccines and by including calendar month in the SCCS models.

resultsWith 13,940 first-ever tinnitus events among recipients of COVID-19 XBB.1.5 vaccines, no increased risk was observed within 1-14 or 1-28 days following vaccination in overall analyses. The RI was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.67-0.90) for the 14-day risk interval and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.78-0.96) for the 28-day interval. Subgroup analyses by age and influenza vaccine coadministration status also showed no significant increase in RI. Similarly, no significantly elevated RI was found for first-in-1-year tinnitus in the overall analyses, age-specific analyses, or analyses by coadministration with influenza vaccine.

conclusionOur findings suggest no increased tinnitus risk following COVID-19 XBB.1.5 vaccination, either administered alone or coadministered with influenza vaccine. These results provide reassuring evidence of the safety of COVID-19 vaccines with respect to tinnitus risk.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesTinnitusVaccinationAdolescentAdultAgedCaliforniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCoadministrationCOVID-19 vaccinationCOVID-19 XBB.1.5Influenza vaccinationSelf-controlled case seriesTinnitus

Identifiers

PMID40716143
PMCPMC13354291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.