Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40716042›Full record

ReviewAustralian veterinary journal2025

Feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) infection in domestic pet cats in Australia and New Zealand: Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention and management.

M E Westman, S J Coggins, M van Dorsselaer, J M Norris, R A Squires, M Thompson, R Malik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Australian veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M E WestmanSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7400-1960
S J CogginsSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8683-5014
M van DorsselaerThe Cat Clinic, New Town, Tasmania, Australia.
J M NorrisSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0003-6930
R A SquiresCollege of Public Health, Medical & Vet Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9887-3357
M ThompsonSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5136-3982
R MalikCentre for Veterinary Education, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6025-194X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progressive feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) infection dramatically shortens the lives of infected cats, causing acquired immunodeficiency, aplastic anaemia, lymphoma, leukaemia and other myeloproliferative diseases. The potential impact of regressive FeLV infection on the development of disease remains largely unknown, although there is evidence it contributes to lymphoma development. Despite a perception that there has been a general decline in the incidence of progressive FeLV infection in Australia and New Zealand, it remains an important health threat and the risk of infection should not be ignored. Clinicians should therefore have a thorough understanding of the complexities surrounding the diagnosis, management and prevention of this disease. Point-of-care (PoC) antigen testing using whole blood is the first step to detect progressive FeLV infection. Clinicians should remember the increased rate of false-positive results using such kits when the disease being detected is at a low prevalence. We therefore advise that confirmatory FeLV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing to detect proviral DNA is essential before a PoC-positive cat can be confirmed as being FeLV-infected. Critically, progressively infected cats should not be euthanased because of a positive FeLV diagnosis, as some cats will remain healthy for many years. Regressively infected cats should not be used as blood donors, so blood donor programmes should include FeLV antigen and provirus PCR testing in their standard screening protocols. No cure currently exists for progressive or regressive FeLV infection; therefore, veterinarians should advocate to minimise the exposure of cats to FeLV as a first-line preventative strategy. The most reliable way to achieve this is for cats to be kept indoors, or with secured outdoor access (e.g., cat enclosures and secure gardens). Cats kept in this manner do not require FeLV vaccination. All animal holding facilities should aim to individually house untested adult cats to limit the spread of FeLV infection. For at-risk cats that cannot be kept indoors/enclosed, or for cats that live together with known FeLV-infected cats, vaccination should be undertaken. Two pentavalent vaccines containing inactivated whole-FeLV are currently available in Australia, whereas no FeLV vaccine is currently available in New Zealand. Given the unavailability of monovalent FeLV vaccines, we endorse the use of a pentavalent vaccine in Australia only in FeLV-endemic catteries or in situations where there is a demonstrable and substantial risk of FeLV exposure. Manufacturers are encouraged to reintroduce efficacious monovalent FeLV vaccines in Australia and New Zealand. Further research into potential antiretroviral therapy to treat FeLV infections in cats is needed.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesLeukemia, FelineLeukemia Virus, FelineRetroviridae InfectionsTumor Virus InfectionsAnimalsAustraliaCatsNew ZealandPetsantibodiesdiagnosisfeline leukaemia virusguidelinesinfectionPCRreviewsalivatreatmentvaccinationveterinary science

Identifiers

PMID40716042
PMCPMC12500364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.