Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715973›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

An extended Chinese social evaluative word list.

Lulu Li, Qingrong Chen, Hu Chuan-Peng

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lulu LiSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Gulou District, No. 122 Ninghai Road, Nanjing, 210097, China.
Qingrong ChenSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Gulou District, No. 122 Ninghai Road, Nanjing, 210097, China. qrchen@njnu.edu.cn.
Hu Chuan-PengSchool of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Gulou District, No. 122 Ninghai Road, Nanjing, 210097, China. hcp4715@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7503-5131

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32471097National Social Science Fund of China 21&ZD288Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province KYCX23_1585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social evaluation, i.e., people's views of self, others, and groups, is ubiquitous and embedded in our language. In turn, social evaluative words are used intensively in studies of human social evaluation. However, standardized Chinese word lists for social evaluation are under-developed; the only available word lists are based on the big-two model of social evaluation (i.e., agency and warmth) and cover small numbers of words. To fill the gap, we conducted a survey with a relatively large sample (n = 1,270, 50% female) and a large number of words (1,908) that might describe extended social evaluative dimensions: appearance, socioeconomic status, sociability, competence, and morality. The participants rated the extent to which each word described a certain social evaluation dimension and how positive/negative each word was. Based on this dataset, we selected words that dominantly describe one of the five dimensions. The final word list has 1,040 words, including 245 appearance words (143 positive, 11 neutral, 91 negative), 108 socioeconomic status words (36 positive, 2 neutral, 70 negative), 93 sociability words (53 positive, 5 neutral, 35 negative), 261 competence words (185 positive, 4 neutral, 72 negative), and 333 morality words (149 positive, 1 neutral, 183 negative). This word list provides an extended Chinese social evaluative word list and will serve as a useful resource for researchers in social psychology, linguistics, sociology, and computational social science.

Indexed as

LanguageSocial PerceptionVocabularyAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleMoralsYoung AdultAppearanceCompetenceMoralitySociabilitySocial evaluationSocioeconomic statusWord list

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.