Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715956›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Professional Responsibilities for Planetary Health Stewardship.

Robert McLean, Hardeep Singh

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Robert McLeanYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Hardeep SinghCenter for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. hardeeps@bcm.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4419-8974

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS028595AHRQ HHS R18 HS029347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a sociopolitical environment that challenges progress in addressing climate change, physicians should play a central role in accelerating activities related to climate action, environmental sustainability, and resilience. For instance, stewardship as a physician's professional responsibility should include proactive and consistent planetary health stewardship versus a solely reactive and intermittent response to the increasing intensity and frequency of climate-related catastrophic events. We define planetary health stewardship as optimizing physician decision-making to include considerations around the interdependent relationship between human health and the environment, recognizing the need for physicians and their professional societies to address social, economic, and environmental factors that impact human well-being. Its implementation requires physicians to be equipped with the knowledge, skills, and competencies of planetary health stewardship, a culture that enables more holistic consideration of health and its relationship to the natural environment, and supportive systems. Physicians should work with their professional societies to contextualize policies, guidelines, and recommendations within planetary health stewardship and help realize its associated co-benefits, such as higher quality of care, waste reduction, financial savings, efficiency, and improved outcomes. Because general internists often transcend the domains of comprehensive whole-person care, education, research, and policy, they are well-positioned to become active advocates and role models to accelerate the transformation of healthcare systems through planetary health stewardship.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeGlobal HealthPhysician's RoleSocial ResponsibilityHumans

Identifiers

PMID40715956
PMCPMC12894543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.