ArticleDiscover nano2025
Efficient encapsulation of CRISPR-Cas9 RNP in bioreducible nanogels and release in a cytosol-mimicking environment.
Article in Discover nano, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeted Nanoparticle Delivery CRISPR/Cas9: overcoming biological barriers, enhancing stability, and improving therapeutic precision.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated programmable gene editing has disrupted the biotechnology industry since it was first described in 2012. Safe in vivo delivery is a key bottleneck for its therapeutic use. Viral vector-mediated delivery raises concerns due to immunogenicity, long-term expression, and genomic disruption. Delivery of pre-complexed ribonucleoprotein (RNP) reduces off-target effects, and recombinant Cas9 production is more cost-effective than viral vector synthesis. CRISPR-Cas RNPs do not possess intrinsic cell entry mechanisms, and physical delivery methods are confined to ex vivo editing, necessitating non-viral delivery approaches. Nanogels (NG) are biocompatible polymeric nanoparticles capable of entrapping proteins. Here, we report the first proof of principle that NGs from thiol-functionalized polyglycidol can entrap active RNPs with high efficiency (60 ± 2%). We call these particles CRISPR-Gels. A commercially available E. coli lysate for cell-free transcription and translation (TXTL) was used to mimic the intracellular reductive degradation of NGs while providing a real-time fluorescence readout of RNP activity. Degradation and RNP activity were observed within 30-90 min. The described TXTL assay can be utilized to evaluate the release of RNP in a cytosol-mimicking environment from redox-sensitive nanoparticles in a high-throughput and cost-effective way. Further studies are needed to assess the in vitro and in vivo performance of CRISPR-Gels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.