Trial reportBehavior research methods2025
Watching movies in VR: A research ecosystem for the study of screen media effects.
Trial report in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce a virtual reality (VR) research ecosystem for the study of screen media effects and present a study providing evidence for its usability and validity. The study tested whether responses to affect-laden films presented on a standard TV within a physical space can be replicated in a virtual environment. The virtual setting was developed using Vizard 7.0, an open-access and customizable solution for media research. Using a between-subjects design, 70 participants were randomly assigned to either a TV or VR condition. Both groups were exposed to the same set of nine movie clips, encompassing three emotional categories (scary, funny, sad). While participants in the TV condition watched the clips on a physical 65″ TV, participants in the VR condition watched the clips on a virtual screen in the VR living room using a Meta Quest 2 VR headset. Continuous ratings of perceived emotional intensity and physiological measures of arousal (skin conductance level, heart rate, pulse volume amplitude) served as dependent variables. Overall, results confirmed the convergent validity between the two experimental conditions, revealing high correlations for all process variables across all stimuli. Results also demonstrated distinct responses to the clips of different emotional tones that were consistent across the experimental conditions. The findings encourage the use of VR for the study of screen media effects, demonstrating convergent validity with real-world scenarios while offering significant advantages, such as standardization and portability of the experimental setup as well as high levels of experimental control over reception setting variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.