ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
A Two-Phase Deep Learning Approach for Architectural Distortion Detection in Mammograms.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a global health challenge, ranking as a leading cause of mortality among women worldwide, emphasizing the need for early detection to improve treatment outcomes. Architectural distortion (AD), characterized by subtle disruptions in breast tissue patterns, is one of the earliest and most challenging signs of breast cancer to detect, often manifesting up to 2 years before other signs and providing a critical window for intervention. To address the limitations of traditional AD segmentation methods, this study introduces an advanced deep learning approach to automate and improve AD segmentation and classification on mammograms, significantly reducing radiologists' workload and enhancing diagnostic accuracy. The process began with implementing U-Net++ as a semantic segmentation model for pixel-level classification. Next, a standalone Mask R-CNN was applied, which incorporated instance segmentation for more precise detection of AD regions. Finally, the study introduced a two-phase pipeline that combines Mask R-CNN for segmentation with a ResNet-18 classification model to refine predictions and reduce false positives. Key enhancements, such as smooth L1 for bounding box regression loss and binary cross entropy with Dice loss for mask prediction, significantly improved segmentation metrics. The integrated approach achieved remarkable results with a segmentation accuracy of 0.852, a classification accuracy of 0.915, and a mean average precision (mAP) of 0.894. Furthermore, the sensitivity of our integrated approach was 92.4%. This enhances breast cancer screening and diagnosis, with the results highlighting its potential to improve patient outcomes through timely diagnosis and effective treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.