ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2025
The development and testing of the TTU food cue reactivity image bank.
Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The associations of objective, behaviorally measured hunger and weight-related variables with Food Craving Inventory subscales in adults with obesity.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesMeasuring food cue reactivity (FCR) is essential to understanding human ingestion in behavioral and neuroimaging studies. An image bank that can delineate the truly food-specific FCR response from spurious noise driven primarily by incidental characteristics (e.g., visual properties) of images is a useful addition to the literature. This study sought to develop and test the performance of the TTU Food Cue Reactivity Image Bank that matched 252 image pairs on visual characteristics (i.e., shape, color, visual complexity, and size), and to establish the appeal ratings of the images for use in future applications. SUBJECTS/
methodsThe TTU Food Cue Reactivity Image Bank was initially created, and subsequently evaluated by independent raters. Then, 151 individuals participated in a Qualtrics survey to determine the similarity of image pairs on relevant dimensions (i.e., shape, color, visual complexity, and size) and establish appeal ratings for food and non-food images.
resultsInter-rater agreement was tested using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), which revealed very high agreement among raters for all similarity measures (shape ICC = 0.98; color ICC = 0.97; visual complexity ICC = 0.96; size ICC = 0.96; appeal ICC = 0.93).
conclusionsThe high agreement among raters on the visual characteristics and appeal ratings of the images increases confidence that food-cue-reactivity observed is based on intended "image type" distinctions (i.e., food vs. object) and not incidental visual features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.