ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2025
Quantitative computed tomography provides improved accuracy for diagnosis of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with facet joint osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: Quantitative computed tomography provides improved accuracy for diagnosis of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with facet joint osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Progress in machine learning-assisted medical imaging for osteoarthritis and osteoporosis diagnosis: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study employed both QCT and DXA to assess BMD in the same cohort and investigated the influence of FJOA on BMD measurements and the detection rates of osteoporosis. The results indicate that QCT is more accurate for assessing regional BMD in patients with FJOA. PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the detection rates of lumbar osteoporosis in patients with FJOA between QCT and DXA and to analyze the impact of FJOA on regional BMD measurement using each method.
methodsThis single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included participants without a history of spinal instrumentation surgery, spinal fractures of > 2 levels, spinal tumors or infections, and sacralization of lumbar spine. The detection rates of lumbar osteoporosis between QCT and DXA in patients with FJOA were compared using McNemar's test. Associations between BMDs and FJOA severity were assessed using linear mixed models. Discordance in BMD classification between DXA and QCT was categorized as minor or major according to Woodson's definition.
resultsThe 219 study participants had a mean age of 65.0 ± 10.7 years and included 155 (70.8%) women. The rate of lumbar osteoporosis identification with QCT was noticeably greater than that with DXA (58% vs 34.2%, p < 0.0001). Severe FJOA was independently associated with lower vBMD (multivariable β = - 4.23 (95% confidence interval (CI), - 7.68 to - 0.77); p = 0.17), while both slight-to-moderate and severe FJOA were independently associated with higher areal BMD (aBMD). With increasing FJOA severity, the aBMD measured by DXA also increased (slight-to-moderate, β = 0.31 (95% CI, 0.16-0.46), p < 0.001; severe FJOA, β = 1.03 (95% CI, 0.79-1.27), p < 0.001).
conclusionsMore severe FJOA was associated with higher aBMD on DXA and a lower vBMD on QCT. Additionally, the rate of lumbar osteoporosis detection was significantly higher with QCT than with DXA. These findings indicate that QCT is more accurate for assessing regional BMD in patients with FJOA, supporting the need for caution when using DXA to evaluate BMD in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40715756What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.