Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715726›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2025

Fire-Driven Land Cover Change and Zoonotic Disease Risk in African Landscapes.

Ore Koren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ore KorenDepartment of Political Science, Ostrom Workshop for Political Analysis, and Tobias Center for Innovation in International Development, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA. okoren@iu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-1510

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung Experienced Researcher FellowshipDivision of Social and Economic Sciences 342105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Land use and land cover (LULC) change-especially habitat disruption-has long been linked to zoonotic disease emergence, yet direct empirical evidence remains limited. Using new spatially disaggregated data, this study offers the clearest evidence to date that fire-linked vegetation loss significantly increases zoonotic risk in forest landscapes, but not in agricultural or other-use areas. Monthly vegetation anomalies, captured via NDVI deviations, are tracked across landscape types. A quasi-experimental mediation design estimates the indirect effect of fire on outbreaks through vegetation loss. Results show that in forests, fire-driven vegetation decline is associated with increased outbreak rates, while no significant effects appear in agricultural or other zones. Fires-including slash-and-burn practices and uncontrolled natural fires-hence play a key role in shaping zoonotic risk. The results underscore the need for integrated fire management and land-use strategies to reduce spillover potential and align public health with climate and conservation goals.

Indexed as

FiresZoonosesAfricaAgricultureAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemForestsHumansdeforestationfiresgeolocated datainfectious diseasezoonosis

Identifiers

PMID40715726
PMCPMC12628441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.