Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715701›Full record

ArticleScience China. Life sciences2025

Multi-omic-based classification for identifying optimal neoadjuvant treatment strategies for high-risk early-stage breast cancer.

Fei Ji, Xianzhe Chen, Ciqiu Yang, Liulu Zhang, Mei Yang, Jieqing Li, Hongfei Gao, Teng Zhu, Minyi Cheng, Yitian Chen and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Science China. Life sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Epidemiology, early detection, and management of breast cancer in China: A comprehensive review.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Fei Ji *Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Xianzhe Chen *Department of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Ciqiu YangDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Liulu ZhangDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Mei YangDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jieqing LiDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Hongfei GaoDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Teng ZhuDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Minyi ChengDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Yitian ChenDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Hao PengDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Jin WangDepartment of Medicine, Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Xiamen, 361026, China.
Weiwei LiDepartment of Medicine, Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Xiamen, 361026, China.
Zhan HuangDepartment of Medicine, Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Xiamen, 361026, China.
Changbin ZhuDepartment of Medicine, Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Xiamen, 361026, China.
Kun WangDepartment of Breast Cancer, Cancer Center, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China. wangkun@gdph.org.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapies are essential for managing high-risk early-stage breast cancer, but their effectiveness is limited, necessitating the exploration of the optimal neoadjuvant treatment strategy based on innovative subtypes. Given the heterogeneity inherent in breast cancer, there is growing need for identifying novel molecular subtypes predictive of treatment response through multi-omic analyses. A comprehensive analysis was performed using data from 142 high-risk early breast cancer patients, including genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and phosphoproteomic profiles. The molecular subtypes were explored based on the biological characteristics and responses to neoadjuvant treatments. The results were also validated in the TCGA-breast cancer cohort and external dataset. Three molecular subtypes were identified, each associated with different optimal treatment strategies. The immune-activated (IA) subtype displayed a significantly higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rate when treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant regimens, and exhibited heightened immune cell infiltration. The vesicular transport pathway-activated (VT) subtype, characterized by vesicular transport pathway activation, showed a favorable pCR rate to anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In contrast, the kinase activation (KA) subtype demonstrated limited responsiveness to both platinum and anthracycline-based treatments and featured enrichment in non-canonical TGF-β signaling, MAPK/ATM kinase activation, and angiogenic signatures. A seven-gene classifier linked to non-canonical TGF-β signaling was created to identify the KA subtype, achieving an area under the curve value of 90%. The drug vulnerability of breast cancer cells within the KA subtype indicated potential therapeutic effectiveness of ATR/ATM inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents. This study defined three novel molecular subtypes in high-risk early-stage breast cancer patients and provided optimal therapeutic treatment strategies based on these subtypes. Therefore, important insights about intrinsic biological properties can form the basis for new cancer treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenomicsHumansMultiomicsNeoplasm StagingProteomicsTranscriptomeBiomarkers, Tumorhigh-risk early breast cancermolecular subtypingmulti-omicneoadjuvant treatment

Identifiers

PMID40715701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.