Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715683›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025

Are the differences between intra-line and return-sweep fixation durations driven by linguistic, oculomotor, or visual processing? A comparison of eye movements during reading and z-string scanning.

Adam J Parker, Muchan Tao, Martin R Vasilev

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam J ParkerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, WC1H 0AP, London, UK. adam_parker@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1367-2282
Muchan TaoDepartment of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, Chandler House, 2 Wakefield Street, WC1N 1PF, London, UK.
Martin R VasilevDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, WC1H 0AP, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-8828

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Return-sweeps, which move the reader's gaze from the end of one line to the beginning of the next, typically result in shorter line-final fixations and longer accurate line-initial fixations compared to intra-line fixations. The mechanisms underlying these differences have been the subject of debate. To assess the linguistic and oculomotor contributions to these return-sweep fixation differences, we compared the eye movements of 41 participants during reading and z-string scanning, an oculomotor control condition that is devoid of useful linguistic content. Our results indicate that line-final fixations are shorter than intra-line fixations, while accurate line-initial fixations are longer than intra-line fixations, under both tasks, underscoring the significant role of the oculomotor system in determining fixation durations across tasks. Notably, the reduction in line-final fixation durations compared to intra-line fixations did not differ between tasks. This suggests that oculomotor coordination or visual processing, rather than linguistic processing, drives shorter line-final fixations. In contrast, the difference in the increase in duration for accurate line-initial fixations between reading and z-string scanning implies that longer accurate line-initial fixations are likely a result of lexical processing, oculomotor coordination, and visual processing. These findings advance our understanding of eye movement control by highlighting the combined influence of linguistic and oculomotor processes on return-sweep fixation durations.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsFixation, OcularPattern Recognition, VisualReadingVisual PerceptionAdultEye Movement MeasurementsFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultEye movementsOculomotor coordinationReadingReturn-sweepsZ-string scanning

Identifiers

PMID40715683
PMCPMC12627124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.