ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025
Clinical performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus central nervous system infections.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adult Epstein-Barr virus encephalitis: a retrospective case report series with metagenomic next-generation sequencing-based diagnosis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has been widely utilized for diagnosing infectious diseases. However, studies employing mNGS to detect EBV central nervous system (CNS) infections remain scarce. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of mNGS in EBV CNS infections. Patients discharged with the diagnosis of CNS viral infection and underwent lumbar puncture for mNGS of cerebrospinal fluid between January 2021 and May 2024 were selected. The selected cerebrospinal fluid samples were subjected to PCR, including those that were EBV-negative in mNGS. Clinical data were collected for analysis. A total of 96 samples were included: 18 samples in the EBV infection group (PCR EBV DNA +), 30 samples in the suspected EBV infection group (PCR EBV DNA - but mNGS +), and 48 samples in the non-EBV-infected group (PCR EBV DNA - and mNGS -). All PCR-positive samples were also positive by mNGS, and in the EBV infection group, the viral load detected by PCR was strongly correlated with the number of sequences identified by mNGS (ρ = 0.752, p = 0.00). The number of sequences in the EBV infection group was higher than that in the suspected EBV infection group (14 vs. 4, p = 0.04). Patients in the EBV high sequence group experienced fewer headaches, nausea, and vomiting, had less elevated intracranial pressure, but required longer hospitalization (p = 0.003, 0.005, 0.03, and 0.03, respectively). The mNGS method is a sensitive tool for detecting EBV CNS infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40715670What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.