ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Design and validation of a rapid visual processing measure for screening reading difficulties in early childhood.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Visual Attention to Literacy: Symbol Search Deficit Predicts Future Reading Difficulties From Age 3.Developmental science · 2026Article
- Visual processing is a language-agnostic window into heterogeneity in early reading development.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As the development of visual processing abilities is known to precede the development of reading abilities, identifying visual measures that reliably correlate with reading measures has tremendous theoretical and practical importance. A major challenge in addressing this question empirically is developing reliable behavioral measures for developmental studies, because most tasks are not equally reliable across different age groups and require iterative design changes to ensure that the measure reliably indexes the intended construct across the developmental span. Here, we present a series of studies that show how to iteratively modify a behavioral task by data-informed task changes and the use of item response theory to reduce task redundancies and develop a fun, fast, reliable, and easy-to-deploy web-based measure for K/1/2-graders in school settings. Our results show, in a large, diverse, and representative sample (N ~ 1,550), that the ability to rapidly encode visual information reliably correlates with reading outcomes at the end of the academic year. The developed measure offers the potential for use as an early screening tool to identify children at risk for developing future reading challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.