SynthesisAging clinical and experimental research2025
Clinical prediction models using artificial intelligence approaches in dementia.
Synthesis in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Electronic health record-based prediction models for dementia detection: a systematic review of model performance and quality.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Pooled it
- Corpus callosum fractional anisotropy from routine diffusion tensor imaging predicts dementia in older adults beyond clinical risk factors.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Adaptive cascading artificial intelligence for Alzheimer's disease assessment: a clinically oriented narrative review and implementation framework.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- The past, present, and future of Alzheimer's disease-part 3: the future.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2026Review
- The role of brain health and resilience in reshaping trajectories of late-life neuropsychiatric disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- MMSE-Based Dementia Prediction: Deep vs. Traditional Models.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile nearly half of all dementia cases are potentially preventable, early detection and targeted interventions are critical. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced clinical prediction models offer promising tools to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy by leveraging machine learning (ML) to integrate diverse data sources. This systematic review evaluates the development, performance, and clinical applicability of AI-based prediction models in dementia.
methodsSearches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies up to October 2024, focusing on AI-based models predicting dementia onset. Included studies were assessed for model accuracy, bias, and generalizability using the PROBAST tool. Data extraction adhered to the TRIPOD and CHARMS frameworks, capturing study design, participant demographics, predictor variables, and performance metrics.
resultsAmong 2699 articles initially screened, 21 studies were included, encompassing over 1 million participants. AI models, extremely heterogenous for their nature, demonstrated good predictive accuracy, with a mean area under the curve of 0.845. While internal validation was conducted in all studies, external validation was limited. Models incorporating ML methods like random forests and support vector machines outperformed traditional approaches. The most used parameters were clinical and cognitive data, whilst data about biomarkers were the less used. Risk of bias was generally low, though calibration and generalizability remained challenges.
conclusionsAI-based prediction models show strong potential for early dementia detection and personalized care. However, their integration into clinical practice requires addressing issues of external validation, data representativeness, and model interpretability. Further research should focus on robust validation and ethical implementation to optimize their utility in dementia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.