Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40715606›Full record

SynthesisAging clinical and experimental research2025

Clinical prediction models using artificial intelligence approaches in dementia.

Nicola Veronese, Francesco Bolzetta, Livia Gallo, Giorgia Durante, Laura Vernuccio, Carlo Saccaro, Caterina Maria Gambino, Carlo Custodero, Piero Portincasa, Andrea Morotti and 5 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Adaptive cascading artificial intelligence for Alzheimer's disease assessment: a clinically oriented narrative review and implementation framework.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. The role of brain health and resilience in reshaping trajectories of late-life neuropsychiatric disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Nicola VeroneseGeriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 141, 90127, Palermo, Italy. nicola.veronese@unipa.it.
Francesco BolzettaAzienda Unità Locale Socio-Sanitaria 3, Venice, Italy.
Livia GalloAzienda Unità Locale Socio-Sanitaria 3, Venice, Italy.
Giorgia DuranteAzienda Unità Locale Socio-Sanitaria 3, Venice, Italy.
Laura VernuccioGeriatrics Section, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.
Carlo SaccaroGeriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 141, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
Caterina Maria GambinoGeriatrics Section, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico "P. Giaccone", Palermo, Italy.
Carlo CustoderoClinica Medica ″Augusto Murri″, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari ″Aldo Moro″, Bari, Italy.
Piero PortincasaClinica Medica ″Augusto Murri″, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari ″Aldo Moro″, Bari, Italy.
Andrea MorottiSC Neurology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Alice GalliSC Neurology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Chiara TrasciattiSC Neurology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Alessandro PadovaniSC Neurology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Andrea PilottoSC Neurology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Mario BarbagalloGeriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro, 141, 90127, Palermo, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute PNRR-MCNT1-2023-12378321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile nearly half of all dementia cases are potentially preventable, early detection and targeted interventions are critical. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enhanced clinical prediction models offer promising tools to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy by leveraging machine learning (ML) to integrate diverse data sources. This systematic review evaluates the development, performance, and clinical applicability of AI-based prediction models in dementia.

methodsSearches of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified peer-reviewed studies up to October 2024, focusing on AI-based models predicting dementia onset. Included studies were assessed for model accuracy, bias, and generalizability using the PROBAST tool. Data extraction adhered to the TRIPOD and CHARMS frameworks, capturing study design, participant demographics, predictor variables, and performance metrics.

resultsAmong 2699 articles initially screened, 21 studies were included, encompassing over 1 million participants. AI models, extremely heterogenous for their nature, demonstrated good predictive accuracy, with a mean area under the curve of 0.845. While internal validation was conducted in all studies, external validation was limited. Models incorporating ML methods like random forests and support vector machines outperformed traditional approaches. The most used parameters were clinical and cognitive data, whilst data about biomarkers were the less used. Risk of bias was generally low, though calibration and generalizability remained challenges.

conclusionsAI-based prediction models show strong potential for early dementia detection and personalized care. However, their integration into clinical practice requires addressing issues of external validation, data representativeness, and model interpretability. Further research should focus on robust validation and ethical implementation to optimize their utility in dementia care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDementiaHumansMachine LearningPrognosisArtificial intelligenceClinical prediction modelsDementiaMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40715606
PMCPMC12296797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.