ArticleScientific reports2025
Survival guided adaptive clustering enhances mortality risk stratification and radiotherapy guidance in early stage uterine sarcoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Surgical approach selection and perioperative-pathological characteristics in endometrial cancer: a retrospective observational study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uterine sarcomas are rare and aggressive tumors with heterogeneous outcomes, making accurate risk stratification crucial for personalized treatment. This study introduced a novel semi-supervised clustering approach, survival-guided adaptive Kmeans (SGAKmeans), for enhanced mortality risk stratification in early-stage uterine sarcoma patients. SGAKmeans uniquely integrated clinical characteristics and survival information, leveraging domain knowledge and soft pairwise constraints to adaptively adjust distance calculations. Using data from 1,836 uterine sarcoma patients in localized or regional stages in the SEER database, SGAKmeans identified three distinct risk groups with significantly different survival outcomes: high-risk (n = 293, 90.1% mortality, median survival 17 months), medium-risk (n = 767, 59.6% mortality, median survival 66 months), and low-risk (n = 776, 21.3% mortality). The method outperformed eight traditional clustering approaches in risk stratification performance and demonstrated robustness across various data distribution scenarios. Notably, the stratified groups showed differential responses to radiotherapy: high-risk patients benefited significantly (hazard ratio: 0.695, 95% CI 0.541-0.894), medium-risk patients showed no significant difference (0.910, 95% CI 0.747-1.110), while low-risk patients exhibited worse outcomes with radiotherapy (1.826, 95% CI 1.278-2.607). These findings highlighted the potential of SGAKmeans for more nuanced risk stratification and personalized treatment decisions in early-stage uterine sarcoma management, promoting precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.