ArticleScientific reports2025
CT-free kidney single-photon emission computed tomography for glomerular filtration rate.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognostic significance of early cortical functional integrity measured byEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores an artificial intelligence-based approach to perform CT-free quantitative SPECT for kidney imaging using Tc-99 m DTPA, aiming to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) without relying on CT. A total of 1000 SPECT/CT scans were used to train and test a deep-learning model that segments kidneys automatically based on synthetic attenuation maps (µ-maps) derived from SPECT alone. The model employed a residual U-Net with edge attention and was optimized using windowing-maximum normalization and a generalized Dice similarity loss function. Performance evaluation showed strong agreement with manual CT-based segmentation, achieving a Dice score of 0.818 ± 0.056 and minimal volume differences of 17.9 ± 43.6 mL (mean ± standard deviation). An additional set of 50 scans confirmed that GFR calculated from the AI-based CT-free SPECT (109.3 ± 17.3 mL/min) was nearly identical to the conventional SPECT/CT method (109.2 ± 18.4 mL/min, p = 0.9396). This CT-free method reduced radiation exposure by up to 78.8% and shortened segmentation time from 40 min to under 1 min. The findings suggest that AI can effectively replace CT in kidney SPECT imaging, maintaining quantitative accuracy while improving safety and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.