ArticleScientific reports2025
Longitudinal dynamics of clinical and neurophysiological changes in parkinson's disease over four and a half years.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Age-Related Differences in Corticospinal Function and Muscle Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- The genetic architecture of Parkinson's disease in Mexico: a systematic review.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Parkinson's Disease: From Gene-Environment Risk to Precision Therapy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sex-Specific Association Between XPC rs2228001 Polymorphism and Parkinson's Disease Risk in a Mexican Population: A Case-Control Study Exploring Gene-Environment Interactions.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Elevated Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration as a Potential Peripheral Biomarker of Parkinson's Disease: A Pilot Case-Control Study in a Mexican Population.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a clinically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder whose trajectory is shaped by progressive motor impairment and cortical dysfunction. However, longitudinal studies integrating clinical scales with direct neurophysiological assessments remain scarce. In this 4.5-year cohort study, we conducted one of the longest clinical-electrophysiological follow-ups in PD to date, evaluating 22 patients across early and advanced stages using both Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) scores and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We demonstrate that the cortical silent period (CSP), a marker of GABAergic inhibition, progressively lengthens over time and is associated with motor decline, suggesting its potential as a dynamic biomarker of disease progression. Resting motor threshold (rMT) and motor asymmetry also deteriorated longitudinally, with changes most pronounced following the COVID-19 pandemic-suggesting that environmental stressors may accelerate PD pathophysiology. Unlike prior short-term studies, our findings reveal persistent cortical reorganization over several years, independent of sex, and underscore the clinical relevance of TMS-derived metrics in tracking disease progression. These findings suggest that CSP may serve as a non-invasive and scalable biomarker for monitoring Parkinson's disease progression and informing neurophysiological endpoints in future therapeutic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.