ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization of concrete with human hair using experimental study and artificial neural network via response surface methodology and ANOVA.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable construction materials has prompted the investigation of non-biodegradable waste, such as human hair (HH), for concrete reinforcement. This study seeks to evaluate the impact of HH fiber on the fresh, physical, and mechanical characteristics of concrete. HH was incorporated in varying proportions (1-5% by weight of cement), along with modifications in cement content, to ascertain optimal performance conditions. An extensive experimental program was executed, succeeded by the utilization of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to formulate predictive models for compressive strength (CS), flexural strength (FS), and splitting tensile strength (STS). Furthermore, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were utilized to identify statistically significant factors and optimize the mix design. The findings indicated that the mechanical performance of concrete enhanced with HH inclusion up to 3%, after which a deterioration ensued, presumably due to inadequate dispersion and workability challenges. The ANN models precisely predicted mechanical outcomes, while the RSM-derived models demonstrated strong correlations, with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.